ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Assessment of anemia recovery using peripheral blood smears by deep semi-supervised learning.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microscopic image enhancement for accurate sickle cell disease identification using intuitionistic fuzzy driven retinex.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring anemia recovery is crucial for clinical intervention. Morphological assessment of red blood cells (RBCs) with peripheral blood smears (PBSs) provides additional information beyond routine blood tests. However, the PBS test is labor-intensive, reliant on manual analysis, and susceptible to variability in expert interpretations. Here we introduce a deep semi-supervised learning method, RBCMatch, to classify RBCs during anemia recovery. Using an acute hemolytic anemic mouse model, PBS images at four different time points during anemia recovery were acquired and segmented into 10,091 single RBC images, with only 5% annotated and used in model training. By employing the semi-supervised strategy Fixmatch, RBCMatch achieved an impressive average classification accuracy of 91.2% on the validation dataset and 87.5% on a held-out dataset, demonstrating its superior accuracy and robustness compared to supervised learning methods, especially when labeled samples are scarce. To characterize the anemia recovery process, principal components (PCs) of RBC embeddings were extracted and visualized. Our results indicated that RBC embeddings quantified the state of anemia recovery, and the second PC had a strong correlation with RBC count and hemoglobin concentration, demonstrating the model's ability to accurately depict RBC morphological changes during anemia recovery. Thus, this study provides a valuable tool for the automatic classification of RBCs and offers novel insights into the assessment of anemia recovery, with the potential to aid in clinical decision-making and prognosis analysis in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.