Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982502›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Endovascular treatment of chronic pelvic vein obstruction].

Michael Lichtenberg, Houman Jalaie

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael LichtenbergKlinik für Angiologie, Klinikum Hochsauerland, Stolte Ley 5, 59759, Arnsberg-Hüsten, Deutschland. m.lichtenberg@klinikum-hochsauerland.de.
Houman JalaieKlinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic venous obstructions frequently lead to a substantial reduction in the quality of life of affected patients and as a result to a burden on the healthcare system. Endovascular recanalization and stent implantation of iliofemoral venous obstructions are successful minimally invasive approaches; however, there are still open questions with respect to patient selection, technical procedures and long-term results. This review article summarizes the current state of knowledge on the interventional treatment of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), particularly on the development of endovascular procedures and stent implantation. Criteria for the patient selection, details of the procedure and the characteristics of special venous stents are discussed.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIliac VeinPelvisPostthrombotic SyndromeChronic DiseaseHumansPatient SelectionStentsChronic venous outflow obstructionMinimally invasive surgeryPatient selectionPostthrombotic syndromeStents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.