ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Warm irrigation fluid effect on Thulium fiber laser (TFL) ablation of uroliths.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Photobiomodulation in dentistry: Mechanisms, clinical applications and evidence-based guidelines.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior laser studies have demonstrated that as the temperature of a medium increases, the amount of energy delivered to the target increases. We sought to investigate the role of irrigation fluid temperature on Thulium fiber laser (TFL) urolith ablation. 360 calculi were divided in vitro according to chemical composition: calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), cystine (CYS), struvite (STR), calcium phosphate (CAP), uric acid (UA), and calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD). A 200 μm TFL was placed directly on each stone, while immersed in 0.9% NaCl at four different temperatures (25 C, 37 C, 44 C, 60 C) and a single laser pulse administered at distinct energy settings (0.1 J, 0.5 J, 1.5 J). Optical coherence tomography assessed the resulting ablation cone volume. Mean stone volume and porosity were evaluated through ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analysis. A multivariate generalized model for each composition accounted for the impact of fluid temperature and laser energy on stone ablation. Warmer fluid temperatures yielded greater ablation cone volumes for most energy settings, excluding UA stones. When accounting for chemical composition, higher tensile strength stones (COM, CYS) benefited most from warmer fluid in comparison to frangible stones (CAP, STR). The effects of increasing fluid temperature are modest relative to laser pulse energy as a large temperature increase (i.e. 7ºC) is equivalent to a minor energy increase (i.e. 0.1 J). For non-UA stones, TFL ablation efficiency increases with warmer irrigation fluid. The effect, albeit modest compared to laser pulse energy, was most notable for COM and CYS stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39982499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.