ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Helsinki computed tomography score in predicting short- and long-term outcomes after primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) is performed alongside the removal of mass lesions from traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Helsinki computed tomography (CT) score predicts post-TBI outcomes and is partly based on the size of the mass lesion. It remains unclear if this scoring system can be applied to this subgroup and exhibit discriminative ability. This study sought to validate the prognostic value of the Helsinki CT score in TBI patients undergoing primary DC. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated 187 patients who underwent primary DC for TBI. Short-term outcomes, identified at discharge, included all participants (N = 187), while long-term outcomes were ascertained either through a minimum 12-month follow-up or up to the patient's death (N = 162). The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of 1-3 denoted unfavorable outcomes. Higher Helsinki CT scores corresponded with an increase in unfavorable outcomes. The Helsinki CT score's predictive capability for these outcomes was evident in both the short term (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.08-1.71, p = 0.009) and long term (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01-1.67, p = 0.041). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves was 0.743 (p < 0.001) for the short term and 0.686 (p < 0.001) for the long term. In conclusions, the Helsinki CT score holds considerable prognostic value following primary DC for TBI. Our findings suggest that the size of the mass lesion is not the predominant factor in prognostic judgments after primary DC, nor does it reduce the Helsinki score's utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39982498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.