ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2025
A quick and non-destructive approach to combat timber adulteration using attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics.
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timber adulteration, illegal harvesting, and logging of legally protected timber species are a major threat to biodiversity. Identifying and differentiating low-value timber species from high-grade ones is a prerequisite to combat timber-related crimes. Timber adulteration can be detected by techniques such as DNA barcoding. However, these techniques have some drawbacks as they are time-consuming and destructive. To address all these issues, in this study, a quick and non-destructive approach has been used to detect timber adulteration by identifying and discriminating selective timber species using vibrational spectroscopy along chemometric methods such as principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) that successfully differentiated Tectona grandis (teak) from Magnolia champaca (champ) with 96.25% accuracy, Swietenia macrophylla (mahogany) from Magnolia champaca with 97.5% accuracy, and Artocarpus heterophyllus (Jack) from Mangifera indica (mango) with 100% PCA LDA training accuracies. Partial least square discriminant analysis successfully differentiated the timber species with 100% accuracy. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and chemometric tools proved to be effective in detecting timber adulteration, which will help the investigating agencies combat timber-related crimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39982486What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.