Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982339›Full record

ReviewEuropean burn journal2025

Early Detection, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Infection to Avoid Sepsis and Septic Shock in Severely Burned Patients: A Narrative Review.

Patrick M Honoré, Sydney Blackman, Emily Perriens, Jean-Charles de Schoutheete, Serge Jennes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European burn journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick M HonoréCHU UCL Namur Godinne, UCL University, Campus Godinne, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium.
Sydney BlackmanChirec Hospitals, ULB University, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Emily PerriensFaculty of Medicine, ULB University, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-5546
Jean-Charles de SchoutheeteBurn Unit, Grand Hopital de Charleroi, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-7682
Serge JennesBurn Unit, Grand Hopital de Charleroi, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early detection, diagnosis, anticipation, and therapy of infections to prevent sepsis and septic shock remain significant challenges in cases of grave burns. This narrative review explores various tools for early infection detection, including emerging biomarkers, the American Burn Association's clinical criteria, and traditional blood parameters. A comparative study of the American Burn Association, Mann-Salinas, and Sepsis-3 criteria highlights the superior early detection capabilities of the Sepsis-3 criteria. However, the authors recommend that sepsis should be prospectively evaluated, identified, and classified by the intensive care group, rather than by relying solely on retrospective items, though the latter may still be necessary in certain cases. Advances in biomarker identification, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gene expression (mRNA) profiling, offer diagnostic advantages over current methods, enabling early detection within 4 to 6 h of intensive care unit admission. Mass spectrometry also shows promise for the rapid determination of bacteria, yeast, and fungi based on bacteria protein profiles. Source control remains crucial, and the use of antibacterial topical agents has significantly improved the survival rates of severely burned patients. However, antibiotic selection must be made judiciously to avoid resistance. Despite these advancements, significant progress is still needed to improve the rapid identification, actual presence, prevention, and therapy of infections to reduce the incidence of sepsis and septic shock in this patient subgroup.

Indexed as

early diagnosisMeSH burnsprimary preventiontherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39982339
PMCPMC11843831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.