Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982325›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Ball-Flight Viewing Duration and Estimates of Passing Height in Baseball.

Emily Benson, Andrew J Toole, Nick Fogt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily BensonCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Andrew J TooleCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Nick FogtCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictions of the vertical location of a pitched ball (termed the passing height) when the ball arrives at an observer may be based on internal models of ball trajectory and situational cues, kinematic cues from the pitcher's motion, and visual ball-flight cues. The informational content of ball-flight cues for judgments of vertical passing height when the ball's launch angle is small and when situational and kinematic cues are limited is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether passing heights can be judged adequately from ball-flight cues and whether judgments of passing height improve as viewing time increases under the aforementioned conditions. Twenty subjects stood 40 feet (12.19 m) from a pneumatic pitching machine that propelled tennis balls toward them at three speeds (from 53 mph (85 kph) to 77 mph (124 kph)). The ball's launch angle was constant. The subject's vision was blocked at 100 ms or 250 ms after pitch release. Subjects indicated the height at which they expected the ball to arrive. In the absence of explicit situational cues or kinematic cues and in the presence of a small and constant launch angle, the longer viewing time of ball-flight cues improved passing height estimates but did not result in accurate responses for the slower speeds.

Indexed as

ball-flight cuescue integrationkinematic cuespassing height estimatessituational cuessports vision

Identifiers

PMID39982325
PMCPMC11843826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.