Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982324›Full record

ReviewMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Beyond the Needle: Innovative Microneedle-Based Transdermal Vaccination.

Hiep X Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Microneedles: Selected Applications for Pediatrics.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Construction and applications of exosome-microneedle integrated systems.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Enhancing vaccine stability in transdermal microneedle platforms.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiep X NguyenFaculty of Pharmacy, Phenikaa University, Yen Nghia, Ha Dong, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination represents a critical preventive strategy in the current global healthcare system, serving as an indispensable intervention against diverse pathogenic threats. Although conventional immunization relies predominantly on hypodermic needle-based administration, this method carries substantial limitations, including needle-associated fear, bloodborne pathogen transmission risks, occupational injuries among healthcare workers, waste management issues, and dependence on trained medical personnel. Microneedle technology has emerged as an innovative vaccine delivery system, offering convenient, effective, and minimally invasive administration. These microscale needle devices facilitate targeted antigen delivery to epidermal and dermal tissues, where abundant populations of antigen-presenting cells, specifically Langerhans and dermal dendritic cells, provide robust immunological responses. Multiple research groups have extensively investigated microneedle-based vaccination strategies. This transdermal delivery technique offers several advantages, notably circumventing cold-chain requirements and enabling self-administration. Numerous preclinical investigations and clinical trials have demonstrated the safety profile, immunogenicity, and patient acceptance of microneedle-mediated vaccine delivery across diverse immunization applications. This comprehensive review examines the fundamental aspects of microneedle-based immunization, including vaccination principles, transcutaneous immunization strategies, and microneedle-based transdermal delivery-including classifications, advantages, and barriers. Furthermore, this review addresses critical technical considerations, such as treatment efficacy, application methodologies, wear duration, dimensional optimization, manufacturing processes, regulatory frameworks, and sustainability considerations, followed by an analysis of the future perspective of this technology.

Indexed as

challengesclassificationsmicroneedlestranscutaneous immunizationvaccination

Identifiers

PMID39982324
PMCPMC11843882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.