Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982243›Full record

ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Success and Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy.

Samuel Han, Jennifer M Kolb, Steven A Edmundowicz, Augustin R Attwell, Hazem T Hammad, Sachin Wani, Raj J Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel HanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-7984
Jennifer M KolbDivision of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Steven A EdmundowiczDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6541-3485
Augustin R AttwellDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Hazem T HammadDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Sachin WaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Raj J ShahDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE TRAINING GRANTT32DK007038 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COLGAN, SEAN P · 1986 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007038NIH HHS 1T32DK007038-43A5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPerforming endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy remains challenging, frequently necessitating the use of forward-viewing endoscopes. Given the challenge in endoscope selection based on the type of altered anatomy, the aim of this study was to examine ERCP success rates by specific endoscopes for different anatomy types.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study examined ERCPs performed in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy during an 18-year period. Enteroscopy success, cannulation success, and intervention success rates were compared between the different anatomy and endoscope types.

resultsThis study included a total of 334 adult patients (665 total ERCPs) with altered anatomy. The pediatric colonoscope was most frequently utilized (32.2%), and the majority of procedures were performed for biliary indications. Enteroscopy success was 82.2% in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 97% in Billroth II, 91.5% in Whipple, and 93.2% in Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ). Cannulation success was 90.5% in RYGB, 90.5% in Billroth II, 83.6% in Whipple, and 90.6% in RYHJ. Intervention success was 88.2% in Billroth II, 65.1% in RYGB, 81.6% in Whipple, and 87.5% in RYHJ. In patients with RYGB and RYHJ, SBE was utilized most frequently, with rotational enteroscopy having the highest success rates. The overall adverse event rate was 5.1%, with the majority of these being mild in severity.

conclusionsThis large retrospective study found ERCP with forward-viewing endoscopes to be safe and effective for a variety of surgically altered anatomy types. Despite recent advances seen with endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage procedures, this study advocates for ERCP as the initial approach for pancreaticobiliary access in surgically altered anatomy.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGastrointestinal TractAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultaltered anatomydouble-balloon enteroscopyERCPRoux-en-Y gastric bypassRoux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomysingle-balloon enteroscopyWhipple

Identifiers

PMID39982243
PMCPMC11843866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.