Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982169›Full record

ArticleJournal of health organization and management2025

Lost in turbulence? Healthcare workers' conceptualisations and experiences with navigating time in personalised care.

Teresa Corbett, Ninna Meier, Jackie Bridges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health organization and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Not the Last Word: Three Thoughts on Work-Life Balancing.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teresa CorbettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ninna MeierDepartment of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jackie BridgesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to explore how healthcare workers (HCWs) navigate and experience time when caring for older cancer patients living with other illnesses. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This paper presents findings from a qualitative study of how HCWs conceptualise and navigate the temporal aspects of delivering personalised care to older people living with multimorbidity. Building on research from organisation studies and the sociology of time, we interviewed 19 UK HCWs about their experiences of delivering care to this patient group.

findingsOur findings illustrate how the delivery of personalised care contradicts contemporary models for healthcare delivery defined by efficiency and standardisation. We found that HCWs engage with time as both a valuable commodity to be rationed and prioritised within a constrained context and as a malleable resource for managing workload and overcoming "turbulence" in the system. However, participants in this study also shared how the simultaneous multiplicity and lack of time had a profoundly personal impact on them through the emotional toll associated with "time debt" and "lost" time. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This research presents a unique analysis of how time is conceptualised and navigated in contemporary healthcare, offering valuable insights for policy improvement. We conclude that personalised models of healthcare are incompatible with many current temporal structures of treatment trajectories and work-practices, by nature of being centred around the person and not the system of delivery.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPatient-Centered CarePrecision MedicineAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomWorkloadAgedHealthcare professionalsHealthcare systemMultimorbidityOlder adultsPersonalised careProfessional-patient relationsQualitative researchStandardisationTemporal patternsTimeWorkload

Identifiers

PMID39982169
PMCPMC11864100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.