ArticleCritical care explorations2025
Variation in Corticosteroid Prescribing Practices for Patients With Septic Shock.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The functional landscape of critical care: a nationwide study of volume, capability, and institutional variation in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Role of Attending Practice Variability in Prone Positioning Initiation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Catecholamine-Refractory Shock: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUnderstanding sources of variation in acute care delivery may inform targeted strategies to promote evidence-uptake. We sought to characterize physician-level and ICU-level variation in corticosteroid prescribing for patients with septic shock.
designWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the electronic health record of a multihospital health system. We identified ICU patients with septic shock admitted between 2018 and 2020. Using medication administration data, we determined which patients received corticosteroids within 2 days of vasopressor initiation. We linked each patient to their attending physician of record using digital signatures from clinical documentation. We then fit a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify factors associated with corticosteroid use and quantify variation in corticosteroid administration across physicians and ICUs.
settingTwenty-six ICUs across nine hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: ICU patients with septic shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsOf 5322 patients with vasopressor dependent septic shock, 1294 (24.3%) were treated with corticosteroids within 2 days of vasopressor initiation. We linked these patients to 174 unique attending physicians across 26 ICUs. At the ICU-level, median corticosteroid use was 21.8% (interquartile range [IQR], 18.5-25.7%). At the physician-level, median corticosteroid use was 22.0% (IQR, 11.9-32.7%). In the mixed-effects regression controlling for patient and physician characteristics, 16.5% of the variation in corticosteroid administration was attributable to the ICUs and 10.1% was attributable to the physicians.
conclusionsBoth ICUs and physicians contribute to observed variation in the use of corticosteroids for vasopressor dependent septic shock. These findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions to standardize evidence-based practices in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.