ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2025
Paul versus Baerveldt 350 glaucoma drainage implants: One-year comparative analysis.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Paul Glaucoma Implant: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and emerging applications.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Minimal effective plate: rethinking plate size in glaucoma drainage devices.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Two-year efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul Glaucoma Implant compared to the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Diplopia following PAUL implantation in the superotemporal quadrant - an underrecognized but severe complication.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of the Ahmed ClearPath versus Ahmed ClearPath Small Tube at Six Months: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) and Baerveldt 350 glaucoma implant (BGI) over a 1-year follow-up period.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted in a private clinic. It compared 27 patients consecutively treated with the PGI to a historical cohort of 29 eyes that received the BGI prior to the introduction of the PGI between 2018 and 2023. Intervention: A new drainage device, the Paul implant, was placed in the anterior or posterior chamber of eyes with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP).
main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were success rate, final mean IOP, IOP reduction percentage, medication reduction, and complications. Statistical analyses, including adjustments for confounders, were used to compare the performance of PGI and BGI over at least a 12-month period.
resultsSignificant reductions in IOP were observed in both groups (P < 0.001). At 1 year, no significant differences were found in mean IOP (BGI: 12.0 mmHg, SD 2.9; PGI: 11.2 mmHg, SD 6.0) or medication usage (P > 0.05). The failure rates were 7% for BGI and 18% for PGI, with complete success rates of 56% for BGI and 32% for PGI. Hypertensive phases occurred in 32% of the BGI cases and in 19% of the PGI cases. No significant differences in the complication rates or postoperative visual acuity were observed between the groups.
conclusionPGI and BGI exhibited comparable efficacy and safety profiles after 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.