Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39982090›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2025

Percentage macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer loss in different stages of glaucoma.

Shah Zalak, Sihota Ramanjit, Sen Ray Swarnali, Choudhary Samiksha, Dhillon Jasleen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shah ZalakDepartment of Glaucoma, Shroff Eye Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sihota Ramanjit
Sen Ray Swarnali
Choudhary Samiksha
Dhillon Jasleen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study is to evaluate the percentage differences in ganglion cell complex (GCC) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) parameters in fellow eyes of the same patient with varying severities of glaucomatous damage. As only the eyes of the same patient with different severities of glaucoma were included in the present study, it could be inferred that the difference in parameters represents the loss leading to the next stage of glaucoma.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 136 adult primary glaucoma eyes of 68 patients. They were divided as follows: Group 1 - normal visual field in one eye and superior nasal step, (mild), in the other, Group 2 - superior nasal step in one eye and superior arcuate scotoma, (moderate) in the other, and Group 3 - superior arcuate scotoma in one eye and biarcuate scotoma, (severe) in the other. GCC and pRNFL measurements on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were statistically assessed as applicable.

resultsThe percentage difference in GCC parameters in fellow eyes from normal field to mild, mild to moderate, and moderate to severe glaucoma in average GCC was 10.04 ± 6.33%, (P = 0.0001), 15.77 ± 9.62%, (P = 0.0001), and 9.06 ± 6.41%, (P = 0.021); in inferior GCC, it was 13.25 ± 8.7%, (P = 0.0002), 18.94 ± 12,61%, (P = 0.0001), and 9.02 ± 6.92%, (P = 0.658), and in superior GCC, it was 7.42 ± 5.79%, (P = 0.002) 15.31 ± 11.07%, (P = 0.004), and 11.23 ± 9.82%,(P = 0.003), respectively. The percentage difference in average pRNFL of fellow eyes from normal field to mild, mild to moderate, and moderate to severe glaucoma in was 16.9 ± 9.85%, (P = 0.001), 18.23 ± 10.47%, (P < 0.0001), and 9.0 ± 7.35%, (P = 0.0004); in inferior pRNFL, it was 18.76 ± 12.38%, (P = 0.001), 19.6 ± 10.3%, (P < 0.0001), and 8.41 ± 7.3%, (P = 0.019), and in superior pRNFL, it was 15.3 ± 9.8%, (P = 0.015), 18.24 ± 13.56%, (P = 0.0003), and 11.46 ± 9.74%, (P = 0.001), respectively. A total of 136 eyes were regrouped by glaucoma severity, and in mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma subgroups. The percentage difference in average GCC was 11.01 ± 9.07%, 17.53 ± 11.29%, and 18.48 ± 11.69%.

conclusionA percentage difference of GCC and pRNFL values could be used for both diagnosis and progression of glaucoma.

Indexed as

GlaucomaIntraocular PressureMacula LuteaNerve FibersOptic DiskRetinal Ganglion CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39982090
PMCPMC12013295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.