ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2025
Safety and efficacy of micropulse in pediatric eyes with refractory glaucoma.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation Versus Continuous Wave Cyclophotocoagulation: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of glaucoma · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of micropulse cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma in children.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Analysis of Pediatric Secondary Glaucoma Patients Treated with Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of ultrasound cycloplasty on ocular biomechanics and refractive parameters: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- MicroPulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Early to Moderate Glaucoma: A Case Series of 11 Eyes with One-Year Follow-Up and Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the safety and efficacy of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) in pediatric eyes with refractory glaucoma.
designHospital-based prospective interventional study.
methodsPatients less than 18 years of age, receiving MP-TSCPC between December 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023 with at least three follow-ups within 6 months period, were included in the study. Post-laser evaluation was done at day 1, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Success outcomes were calculated at 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up.
resultsA total of 23 eyes of 23 patients were included in the study. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering agents (P = 0.041) had significant change compared to the baseline value; however, the change was insignificant when eyes requiring additional IOP-lowering surgeries during the follow-up period were excluded. There was a significant reduction in IOP at each follow-up visit compared to the baseline (P = 0.000014). Two (8.6%) eyes required additional intervention within 1-month follow-up, another six eyes (26%) between 1-3 months, and three eyes (13%) between 3-6 months of MP-TSCPC. Total success was highest at 56.5% (13 eyes) at 1-month follow-up and at least 34.7% (8 eyes) at 6-month follow-up. No major complications were reported in our study.
conclusionMP-TSCPC was found to be safe and effective in pediatric population. However, we observed a gradual reduction in the success with time, and thus, it can be individualized to patients with high risk for incisional surgery or those requiring immediate IOP reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.