ArticleJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2025
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Combined With Concurrent Antegrade Embolization of Large Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts.
Article in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overt hepatic encephalopathy after elective and preemptive TIPS: Risk factors and prognosis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the long-term efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with concurrent antegrade embolization in treating portal hypertension with oesophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with and without large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (L-SPSSs). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analysed data from patients with portal hypertension who underwent TIPS from November 2015 to April 2022. The patients were screened according to the inclusion criteria and were divided into L-SPSSs group (L-S group) and Non L-SPSSs group (Non L-S group). The primary outcome was the 2-year liver transplantation-free survival (TFS) rate. Secondary outcomes contained the incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), ectopic embolization and the 2-year rebleeding rate.
resultsA total of 259 patients were enrolled (64 patients in L-S group and 195 patients in Non L-S group). The average age was 57.2 years, and the success rate of procedure was 100%. Baseline data showed no significant differences between two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the 2-year liver transplantation-free rate between two groups (L-S vs. Non L-S, 84.38% vs. 71.28%; p = 0.045). OHE occurred in 19 (29.69%) patients with L-SPSSs and 104 (53.33%) patients without L-SPSSs, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). And no statistically significant difference was found in ectopic embolism incidence rate and the 2-year rebleeding rate between two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified male gender, portal vein thrombosis and preoperative high blood ammonia levels as independent risk factors for long-term survival.
conclusionCompared to Non L-S group, the patients in L-S group achieve longer liver transplantation-free survival and lower incidence rate of OHE without increasing the risk of 2-year rebleeding and ectopic embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.