Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981802›Full record

ArticleProteomics2025

Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies.

Alexandria Bartlett, J Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz, Tanner Richie, Casey M Theriot, Manuel Kleiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandria BartlettDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4350-0542
J Alfredo Blakeley-RuizDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-5849
Tanner RichieDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Casey M TheriotDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Manuel KleinerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6904-0287

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH TRAININGT32DK007737 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEHZAD Z. SHEIKH · 1996 to 2026
$7.8M
Metaproteomics to investigate intestinal microbiota-host and -diet interactionsR35GM138362 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KLEINER, MANUEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research 593607National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health R35GM138362NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007737NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsDietary ProteinsDNA, BacterialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsCaseinsDietFecesMetagenomicsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProteomicsBacterial ProteinsCaseinsDietary ProteinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID39981802
PMCPMC12353559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.