ArticlePediatric transplantation2025
Identifying Risk Factors for Graft Failure due to Chronic Rejection < 15 Years Post-Transplant in Pediatric Kidney Transplants Using Random Forest Machine-Learning Techniques.
Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative predictive performance of three machine learning algorithms for acute radiation enteritis risk among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A prospective cohort study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Growth and development following paediatric kidney transplantation: Mechanisms, influencing factors, and clinical management.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CD3+ T-cell count prediction for anti-thymocyte globulin treatment monitorization in kidney transplant recipients: a machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic rejection forms the leading cause of late graft loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Despite improvement in short-term graft outcomes, chronic rejection impedes comparable progress in long-term graft outcomes.
methodsData from the national Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) quarterly file from 1987 to 2023, provided by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), and machine-learning techniques were leveraged to determine novel risk factors for graft failure due to chronic rejection in pediatric kidney transplants. A predictive model was developed in conjunction, based on the performances of six classification models, including logistic regression, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Random Forest.
resultsThe 19 pre-transplant and at-transplant factors identified include those substantiated in literature, such as living donor type, cold ischemic time, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, recipient age, and recipient race. Other factors include one-haplotype matched transplants, recipient age being < 5 years, and the proximities of the most and least recent serum crossmatch tests to transplantation. The latter may correlate with recipient sensitization and socioeconomic disparities, but further research must be done to validate this hypothesis. The Random Forest model was selected based on its performance metrics (AUC 0.81).
conclusionsThis case-control study identifies key factors for chronic rejection-caused graft failure 15 years post-transplant in pediatric kidney transplants and develops a Random Forest predictive model based on these factors. Continued investigation is needed to better understand the variables contributing to pediatric chronic kidney rejection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.