Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981769›Full record

SynthesisJournal of experimental botany2025

A survey of triploid block inconsistency: potential mechanisms and evolutionary implications on polyploid speciation.

Susnata Salony, Josselin Clo, Filip Kolář, Clément Lafon Placette

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susnata SalonyDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3617-7409
Josselin CloDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-9481
Filip KolářDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-7992
Clément Lafon PlacetteDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-8104

Funding

Charles University Grant Agency 321222Czech Science Foundation 20-22783SCzech Science Foundation 22-20240S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The triploid block, primarily caused by endosperm developmental issues, is known as a significant barrier to interploidy hybridization among flowering plants and, thereby, polyploid speciation. However, its strength varies across taxa, with some instances of leakiness, questioning its universal role as a barrier. We conducted a literature survey to explore the causes of the variation in the strength of the triploid block across 11 angiosperm families. We assessed the impact of interploidy cross direction, types of endosperm development, endosperm persistence at seed maturity, and divergence between cytotypes using a Bayesian meta-analysis. We found a significant influence of the type of endosperm in shaping variation in triploid block strength. Other factors tested had no impact on triploid seed viability, probably due to limited data and inconsistencies in estimation methods across the literature. In addition, triploid seed viability in experimental crosses was sometimes correlated to the occurrence of triploid hybrids in nature, sometimes not, suggesting a mixed role for the triploid block in shaping interspecies gene flow. Altogether, our study highlights the need for unified approaches in future studies on the triploid block to advance our understanding of its variation and evolutionary implications.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic SpeciationMagnoliopsidaPolyploidyTriploidyEndospermGene FlowHybridization, GeneticSeedsEndosperm developmenthybrid seed lethalityinterploidy gene flownatural variationpolyploidy speciationtriploid block

Identifiers

PMID39981769
PMCPMC12116173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.