Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981758›Full record

Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025

Validity of the Uninjured Limb as a Control for Preoperative Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Ronan Grimandi, Florine Tissier, Marc Garetier, Julien Labban, Romain Gérard, Emmanuelle Courtois-Communier, Christophe Andro, Hélène Bisseriex, François-Xavier Gunepin, Fabrice Rannou and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03200678 (Motor Unit Recruitment Study With Fatigue Testing), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03200678 naunknown statusnot on this map

Motor Unit Recruitment Study With Fatigue Testing: 9 Months Following up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDirection Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRan2018 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Muscle WeaknessArmsisokinetic assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ronan GrimandiORPHY, EA4324, Université de Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4987-9998
Florine TissierORPHY, EA4324, Université de Brest, Brest, France.
Marc GaretierService de Radiologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Clermont-Tonnerre (HIA-CT), Brest, France.
Julien LabbanClinique Mutualiste de Bretagne Occidentale, Quimper, France.
Romain GérardInstitut de chirurgie de l'appareil locomoteur d'Iroise, Brest, France.
Emmanuelle Courtois-CommunierDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
Christophe AndroService de Chirurgie Orthopédie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Clermont-Tonnerre (HIA-CT), Brest, France.
Hélène BisseriexMédecine Physique et Réhabilitation, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Clermont-Tonnerre (HIA-CT), Brest, France.
François-Xavier GunepinClinique Mutualiste de la Porte de l'Orient, Lorient, France.
Fabrice RannouMédecine du Sport et Explorations Fonctionnelles-ASMS (UNH), Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Brest, France.
Marie-Agnès Giroux-MetgesORPHY, EA4324, Université de Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

This research was supported by the French Health Military Service (grant number [2017RC01]), which depends on the French Army Minister (Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées, DCSSA, 60 Boulevard du Général Martial VALIN CS 21623 75509 PARIS cedex 15).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring muscle atrophy in patients undergoing anterolateral cruciate ligament reconstruction is pivotal for optimizing postoperative recovery. Conventionally, the uninjured contralateral limb serves as the control. However, its relevance in patients with prolonged physical activity hiatus due to knee instability remains uncertain. Our objectives were to compare limbs within a control group by assessing combined force measurements, cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and neuromuscular activation. In addition, we compared the contralateral limb of the surgery group preoperatively to the control group. This prospective controlled study (evidence level 2) included 40 healthy subjects (HG) and 30 patients scheduled for ACL surgery (SG). Both groups underwent identical assessments. The two HG limbs were compared to establish the standard difference for all assessed variables, whereas SG contralateral limb was compared with the mean of the control limbs. For HG, the comparisons between limbs showed no significant differences in muscle strength, CSA area, or electromyographic parameters. Similarly, comparisons between the SG contralateral limb and the mean of HG limbs revealed no significant differences in isometric and dynamic strength for the quadriceps and hamstrings (2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.6 ± 0.9 N.m/kg, and 1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 N.m/kg, respectively). Neuromuscular activation and fatigue patterns were also comparable between groups. CSAs discrepancies were attributed to differences in body mass index between groups. These findings indicate that the contralateral limb in ACL_injured patients is functionally similar to that of healthy controls, supporting its use as a valid reference for monitoring postoperative recovery. Trial Registration: NCT03200678.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionMuscular AtrophyAdolescentAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthProspective StudiesYoung AdultACLRdisuseisokineticMRIsurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID39981758
PMCPMC11982620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.