ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
Returning Individualized Wearable Sensor Results to Older Adult Research Participants: A Pilot Study.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 360 Degree Qualitative Ethical Assessment of Reporting Patient Reported Outcomes.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- Preliminary feasibility and development of a heart rate-based mobility and activity scale for hospitalized older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- Preliminary feasibility and development of a heart rate-based mobility and activity scale for hospitalized older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWearable sensors that monitor physical behaviors are increasingly adopted in clinical research. Older adult research participants have expressed interest in tracking and receiving feedback on their physical behaviors. Simultaneously, researchers and clinical trial sponsors are interested in returning results to participants, but the question of how to return individual study results derived from research-grade wearable sensors remains unanswered. In this study, we (1) assessed the feasibility of returning individual physical behavior results to older adult research participants and (2) obtained participant feedback on the returned results.
methodsOlder adult participants (N = 20; ages 67-96) underwent 14 days of remote monitoring with 2 wearable sensors. We then used a semiautomated process to generate a 1-page report summarizing each participant's physical behaviors across the 14 days. This report was delivered to each participant via email, and they were asked to evaluate the report.
resultsParticipants found the reports easy to understand, health-relevant, interesting, and visually pleasing. They had valuable suggestions to improve data interpretability and raised concerns such as comparisons with measures derived from their consumer-grade sensors.
conclusionsWe have demonstrated the feasibility of returning individual physical behavior results from research-grade devices to older research participants, and our results indicate that this practice is well-received. Further research to develop more efficient and scalable systems to return results to participants, and to understand the preferences of participants in larger, more representative samples, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.