ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Linnett is Back: Chemical Bonding through the Lens of Born Maxima.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A one-electron perspective on dative and ionic bonding.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Introduction and Extension of the Unified Theory of Multicenter Bonding: The Role of the Charge-Shift Bonding.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classical Lewis-Langmuir electron pair model remains central to chemical bonding theories despite its inherent contradictions with quantum mechanical principles such as antisymmetry. This paper revisits the long-forgotten Linnett's double quartet (LDQ) model, which integrates spin considerations into chemical bonding. We demonstrate that the distribution of electrons at the maxima of the square of the wave function (Born maxima) highlights the rigidity of the same-spin electron blocks and validates the LDQ framework in atoms and molecules. A generalized LDQ model accounts for all bond types, including covalent, polar covalent, ionic, dative, and electron-deficient, and directly incorporates electron correlation effects, providing a rigorous yet intuitive approach to bonding. This perspective also reveals fundamental flaws in conventional mean-field descriptions that ignore the correlated motion of electrons. By bridging traditional and quantum paradigms, the generalized LDQ model offers a robust tool for understanding chemical bonding, with implications for education, experimental design, and theoretical advancements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.