Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981612›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Linnett is Back: Chemical Bonding through the Lens of Born Maxima.

María Menéndez-Herrero, Evelio Francisco, Ángel Martín Pendás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

María Menéndez-HerreroDepartamento de Química Física y Analítica. Facultad de Química, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7062-4930
Evelio FranciscoDepartamento de Química Física y Analítica. Facultad de Química, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2717-6220
Ángel Martín PendásDepartamento de Química Física y Analítica. Facultad de Química, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-4000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical Lewis-Langmuir electron pair model remains central to chemical bonding theories despite its inherent contradictions with quantum mechanical principles such as antisymmetry. This paper revisits the long-forgotten Linnett's double quartet (LDQ) model, which integrates spin considerations into chemical bonding. We demonstrate that the distribution of electrons at the maxima of the square of the wave function (Born maxima) highlights the rigidity of the same-spin electron blocks and validates the LDQ framework in atoms and molecules. A generalized LDQ model accounts for all bond types, including covalent, polar covalent, ionic, dative, and electron-deficient, and directly incorporates electron correlation effects, providing a rigorous yet intuitive approach to bonding. This perspective also reveals fundamental flaws in conventional mean-field descriptions that ignore the correlated motion of electrons. By bridging traditional and quantum paradigms, the generalized LDQ model offers a robust tool for understanding chemical bonding, with implications for education, experimental design, and theoretical advancements.

Identifiers

PMID39981612
PMCPMC12224293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.