Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981599›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

The pupillary respiratory-phase response: pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation.

Martin Schaefer, Sebastiaan Mathôt, Mikael Lundqvist, Johan N Lundström, Artin Arshamian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Dynamic Link between Respiration and Arousal.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin SchaeferDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-9962
Sebastiaan MathôtDepartment of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-8584
Mikael LundqvistDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-5234
Johan N LundströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-8981
Artin ArshamianDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2282-5903

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 949131Vetenskapsrådet (VR) VR 2018-01603Vetenskapsrådet (VR) VR 2021-01311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiration shapes brain activity and synchronizes sensory and exploratory motor actions, with some evidence suggesting that it also affects pupil size. However, evidence for a coupling between respiration and pupil size remains scarce and inconclusive, hindered by small sample sizes and limited controls. Given the importance of pupil size in visual perception and as a reflection of brain state, understanding its relationship with respiration is essential. In five experiments using a pre-registered protocol, we systematically investigated how respiratory phase affects pupil size across different conditions. In Experiment 1 (n = 50), we examined nasal and oral breathing at rest under dim lighting with nearby fixation points, then replicated these results under identical conditions in Experiment 2 (n = 53). Experiment 3 (n = 112) extended this to active visual tasks, while Experiment 4 (n = 57) extended this to controlled breathing at different paces under ambient lighting with distant fixation. Finally, in Experiment 5 (n = 34), individuals with isolated congenital anosmia (born without olfactory bulbs) were used as a lesion-type model during visual-auditory tasks to assess whether the respiratory-pupil link depends on olfactory bulb-driven oscillations. Across all conditions - free and controlled breathing; different tasks, lighting and fixation distances; and with and without olfactory bulbs - we consistently found that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size, alongside the pupillary light, near fixation and psychosensory responses. KEY POINTS: The influence of respiration on pupil size dynamics has long been debated. In this study, we systematically investigated how pupil size changes across the breathing cycle through a series of five experiments, while varying tasks, lighting, fixation distance and brain region involvement. We show that pupil size is smallest around inhalation onset and largest during exhalation, with pupil dilatation occurring through most of inhalation and the early phase of exhalation, and pupil constriction occurring primarily during the latter part of exhalation. This pattern was consistent across all experimental conditions, demonstrating that it is robust and likely controlled by brainstem circuits. We term this effect the pupillary respiratory-phase response, the fourth known mechanism influencing pupil size.

Indexed as

ExhalationInhalationPupilRespirationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfactory BulbVisual PerceptionYoung Adultbreathinghuman behaviourhuman physiologypupil constrictionpupil dilatationpupil sizerespirationvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID39981599
PMCPMC11908488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.