Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981568›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2025

Morphology and function of pinniped necks: The long and short of it.

Justin Keller, Annalisa Berta, Mark Juhn, Blaire Van Valkenburgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Morphology and function of pinniped necks: The long and short of it.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin KellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Annalisa BertaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Mark JuhnDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Blaire Van ValkenburghDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-4719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial vertebrates from at least 30 distinct lineages in both extinct and extant clades have returned to aquatic environments. With these transitions came numerous morphological adaptations to accommodate life in water. Relatively little attention has been paid to the cervical region when tracking this transition. In fully aquatic cetaceans, the cervical vertebrae are compressed, largely because a loss of neck mobility reduces drag. We ask whether this pattern of cervical evolution is present in the more recently evolved semiaquatic pinnipeds. Here, we compare neck morphology and function in three families of pinnipeds, the Otariidae, Phocidae, and Odobenidae as well as between pinnipeds and their terrestrial arctoid relatives (ursids and mustelids). Using cranial CT scans, we quantified the occipital surface area for neck muscle attachment as well as vertebral size and shape using linear measurements. Results show that pinnipeds have a relatively larger occipital surface area than ursids and terrestrial mustelids, suggesting that marine carnivorans have enlarged their neck muscles to assist with head stabilization during swimming. Within pinnipeds, we found quantitative differences in cervical morphology between otariids and phocids that coincide with their locomotor style. Phocids are hindlimb-dominated swimmers that propel themselves with pelvic oscillations. Their necks are relatively stiff and their cervical vertebrae are compressed anteroposteriorly with reduced muscular attachment areas. By contrast, otariids are forelimb-dominated swimmers that locomote in water and on land using their pectoral limbs, often recruiting their neck to initiate turns underwater as well as assisting in "walking" on land. Consequently, otariids have stronger, more flexible necks than phocids, which is reflected in more elongate cervical vertebral centra with larger muscle attachments. The walrus (Odobenidae) has a cervical vertebrae morphology intermediate to that of phocids and otariids, consistent with a phocid swimming mode combined with a more muscular neck that likely functions in intraspecific conflict and haul-out behavior.

Indexed as

CaniformiaCervical VertebraeNeckNeck MusclesAnimalsBiological EvolutionSwimmingcervical vertebraneck functionoccipital areaPinnipedia

Identifiers

PMID39981568
PMCPMC12594188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.