ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Retinal Vasculitis in the Setting of
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Retinal vasculitis in the setting of positive Case Presentation: The clinical course of 3 patients with retinal vasculitis and mTB exposure were reviewed. Two patients were male, and 1 was female. Mean age at presentation was 56.8 years. Mean follow-up was 119.5 months. Mean presenting visual acuity was Snellen 20/25 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. Mean visual acuity at final visit was 20/30 in both eyes. All 3 patients received antitubercular therapy (ATT). Two patients underwent retinal laser photocoagulation in one or both eyes. Two patients experienced multiple episodes of vitreous hemorrhage. One patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy for non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage in both eyes. Conclusion: The cases demonstrate the potential diagnostic and management variability created by the overlapping features of Eales disease and TRV. All 3 cases had some form of positive mTB testing (radiologic, immunologic, or both) and received different ATT regimens. Case 1 was labeled Eales disease, and cases 2 and 3 were labeled TRV. All 3 had favorable outcomes but only with control of the inflammation and neovascular complications. Recent consensus guidelines now provide guidance on ATT initiation in cases of TRV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.