ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence of Degenerative Spinal Hot Spots on Bone Scintigraphy Among Orthopedic Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High Uptake Detection for Spinal Degenerative Changes: A Comparison Between Bone Scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Combined With High-Resolution Computed Tomography.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEmerging nuclear imaging technologies are advancing the field of spinal diagnostics for degenerative changes. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of spinal hot spots in an orthopedic population undergoing bone scintigraphy (BS) for reasons unrelated to the spine and to assess the correlation of these hot spots with the presence of corresponding spinal complaints.
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients from the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology who provided general consent for the use of their medical data. Adult patients who underwent single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) over a two-year period for non-spinal complaints, along with a corresponding whole-body BS, were included. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of degenerative spinal hot spots detectable on BS. The secondary endpoint evaluated clinical complaints recorded in medical records for each spinal region.
resultsAmong 30 patients (mean age: 66.1 years; 30% male, 70% female), the prevalence of spinal hot spots on BS was 23.3% (n=7) in the cervical spine, 10% (n=3) in the thoracic spine, 33.3% (n=10) in the lumbar spine, and 6.7% (n=2) in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). Most patients with cervical and lumbar hot spots had corresponding spinal symptoms, such as pain, tenderness, or stiffness, documented in their medical records, whereas thoracic complaints were less commonly noted.
conclusionThe study outlines the prevalence of spinal hot spots in various spinal regions among a general orthopedic population undergoing bone scans for non-spinal complaints. A strong correlation was found between spinal complaints and high uptake in the cervical spine and lower back. These findings highlight the added value of comprehensive bone scan evaluations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.