Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981432›Full record

ReviewAnnals of joint2025

Management of coccygodynia: talking points from a systematic review of recent clinical trials.

Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Nicola Maffulli, Tommaso Bardazzi, Michael Memminger, Francesca Alzira Bertini, Filippo Migliorini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of joint, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuel Giovanni MazzoleniDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy.
Nicola MaffulliDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
Tommaso BardazziDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy.
Michael MemmingerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy.
Francesca Alzira BertiniDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-1221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coccygodynia, characterised by localised pain in the coccyx and surrounding tissues, presents challenges in diagnosis and management given its low prevalence and varied aetiology. Traumatic injury, particularly backward falls, is commonly implicated, while non-traumatic causes include degenerative joint disease, overloading stress forces from obesity and morphological variations of the coccyx. Diagnostic evaluation involves medical history, physical examination, and radiographic imaging. While conservative management is often successful, refractory cases necessitate intervention. However, optimal treatment strategies still need to be clarified. The present systematic review discusses the clinical evidence on the management of coccygodynia. Methods: In December 2024, a systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, accessing PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Eligible studies included solely clinical trials investigating coccygodynia management. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-RCTs. Data extraction and statistical analyses followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: Of 407 identified articles, 16 met inclusion criteria, comprising 858 patients, primarily women. Risk of bias assessment revealed varying methodological quality among included studies. Conservative treatments, including physiotherapy and shockwave therapy, showed promise in pain management. Interventional therapies, such as corticosteroid injections and ganglion-impair blockade, demonstrated efficacy in refractory cases. Surgical interventions, particularly coccygectomy, yielded moderate success rates but were associated with notable risks. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach is advocated for managing coccygodynia, with conservative measures as initial strategies. Physical therapy-based interventions and interventional treatments, such as corticosteroid injections and ganglion impair blockade, offer viable options for refractory cases. Surgical intervention should be considered judiciously, weighing risks and benefits based on patient-specific factors and treatment response. Further research is needed to establish standardized guidelines for coccygodynia management based on high-quality evidence.

Indexed as

Coccydyniacoccygeuscoccygodyniamanagementpelvis

Identifiers

PMID39981432
PMCPMC11836747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.