ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Instrument for assessing surgical skills related to performing a vascular anastomosis.
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technical skill is one of the most important components of surgical competence and must be thoroughly learned and developed over the course of surgical residency. However, there are still few instruments for directly appraising and quantifying surgical skill and the majority of centers rely on the subjective observations of tutors. The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review on the subject of instruments for appraisal of surgical skills available for assessment of vascular anastomosis performed by vascular surgery residents. A review was conducted using the following search terms: "educational measurement", "vascular surgery", and "internship and residency". The initial search results comprised 616 articles. After application of the eligibility criteria, just four studies were included in the review, only one of which was conducted in Brazil. Three of the studies used Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) to assess residents. However, all used separate and different supplementary checklists for evaluation of specific skills related to anastomoses. Appropriate appraisal and precise feedback during residency training are an extremely important part of residents' training. Systematic and objective feedback enables errors to be corrected and skills to be polished. Since there is no instrument for assessment of the surgical skills needed to perform anastomosis, after completion of the review a rating instrument was proposed focused on this important skill that vascular surgery residents must acquire. The instrument comprises a compilation of the instruments reviewed and includes a proposed checklist for use in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.