ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Post-saphenous vein ablation compression therapy practices: a study among members of the Brazilian society of angiology and vascular surgery.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite considerable study, there is still no consensus defining the ideal compression regimen after ablation of the great saphenous vein with radio frequency or endolaser. Objective: To identify the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery members' current compression therapy practices after ablation of the great saphenous vein. Methods: A multiple-choice electronic questionnaire on post-endovenous ablation compression was developed and made available on-line to Brazilian vascular surgeons for 60 days. Results: A total of 430 responses were received, 362 (84.2%) of which were considered valid. Laser ablation was the predominant technique (73.5%) and the majority of procedures were conducted in hospitals or day hospitals. Ninety-four percent of the surgeons treated associated varicose veins in the same procedure, for which phlebectomy was the technique most employed. After ablation of the great saphenous vein, 99% of the surgeons applied compression immediately; 34.3% used 35 mmHg compression stockings, 26% preferred crepe bandages, and 12.4% opted for 20-30 mmHg compression stockings, with an average duration of 2.79 (±2 days). After this period, 88.4% used additional compression, with 20-30 mmHg compression stockings (80.9%) and an average duration of 39.3 (±24.0 days). Conclusions: Compression therapy is widely employed after thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. Practice immediately after ablation was divergent, but after the initial phase, the majority of surgeons prescribed additional compression, predominantly using 20-30 mmHg stockings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.