ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025
The relationship between abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter and its risk factors: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus duplex ultrasound and computed tomography angiography for endoleak detection after EVAR: a prospective comparative study.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Elderly Male Patients with Coronary Artery Disease During Standard Transthoracic Echocardiography.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Imaging-Based Anatomical Characterization of Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections: An Observational Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as a focal and persistent dilatation of the abdominal portion of the aorta to a diameter ≥50% larger than the diameter of adjacent segments and involving all three layers of the vessel wall. Objectives: To evaluate whether risk factors (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and age) influence aneurysm expansion. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of a series of cases that included 299 patients treated from January 2007 to January 2020, separated into exposed and unexposed groups by risk factors. Student's Results: Smokers had larger aneurysms than those who had never smoked (p=0.002) and than former smokers (p<0.01) and patients ≤65 years old had larger diameters compared to patients aged 66 to 75 years old (p=0.0226). There were no significant correlations with the other risk factors (diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed the same result, but with a coefficient of determination of 0.0608. Furthermore, smokers, patients with hypertension, patients with dyslipidemia, and patients without diabetes had higher frequencies of much larger aneurysm diameters. Conclusions: It was observed that age ≤65 years and current smoking were related to greater aneurysm diameter. In contrast, the same statistical relationship was not observed for hypertension, absence of diabetes, or dyslipidemia, since there was a greater frequency of discrepant values for these groups. Studies are needed with a more comprehensive analysis of determinants of aneurysm diameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.