ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Leveraging on large language model to classify sentences: a case study applying STAGES scoring methodology for sentence completion test on ego development.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Automated scoring of adult ego development from sentence completions: interpretable maturity indicators derived by evolutionary prompt optimization.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An intelligent agent for sentence completion test: creation and application in depression assessment.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of artificial intelligence and the widespread availability of large language model open the door to text analysis at scale leveraging on complex classification instructions. This case study explores the possibility of using available large language models to measure ego development at scale and establish a methodology that can be applied to other classification instructions. Ego consists of the traits that influence how a person perceives and engages with the world, while ego development is a crucial aspect of adult personality growth, influencing behaviors and decisions in both personal and professional contexts. Accurate assessments of ego development stages are vital for creating effective strategies in organizational psychology and corporate analytics. Methods: This case study investigates the agreement between expert and automated classifications of ego development stages, aiming to evaluate the potential of automation in this domain leveraging artificial intelligence and large language models. Cohen's kappa statistic has been used to measure the agreement between classifications made by experts and those generated by an automated process leveraging large language models. Results: The comparison between the scoring of experts and large language models yielded a weighted Kappa value of 0.779, indicating a substantial level of agreement that is statistically meaningful and unlikely to be due to chance. Discussion: While this suggests valuable scoring that leverages large language models, it also highlights the opportunity for further refinement to closely match expert assessments. We observed low variability in aggregated values, demonstrating that the automated process functions effectively at scale. The robustness of aggregated data is particularly evident when calculating ego development scores for individuals, groups, corporate units, and entire corporations. This capability underscores the utility of the automated system for high-level evaluations and decision-making leveraging on a solid indicator. While the classification system developed in this case study shows promise, targeted enhancements may help to achieve a level of accuracy and reliability that improves alignment with experts' evaluations for single sentences. The methodology developed in this case study appears to be useful to support other evaluations at scale that leverage large language models using other maps of classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.