ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
"Rat race" or "lying flat"? The influence of performance pressure on employees' work behavior.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking citizenship pressure to work-family conflict: the mediating role of citizenship fatigue and the moderating role of mindfulness.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Academic Tangping scale for college students in China: scale development, validation and application.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effectiveness or efficiency: the impact of performance pressure and time pressure on employee feedback-seeking behavior.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Performance pressure refers to employees' subjective perception of the necessity to achieve expected goals, accompanied by a sense of urgency and tension. This study explores how employees cope with performance pressure, focusing on two contrasting strategies: the "rat race" (proactive work behavior) or "lying flat" (work withdrawal). Grounded in the transactional theory of stress and affective event theory, this research aims to uncover the mechanisms through which performance pressure influences work behavior. Methods: A moderated dual-mediation model was developed to examine the dual pathways of challenge appraisal and workplace anxiety as mediators in the relationship between performance pressure and work behavior. Data were collected through a two-stage survey involving 356 employees from various industries. Statistical analyses, including structural equation modeling, were used to test the hypothesized relationships. Results: The findings reveal that performance pressure has a dual effect: it simultaneously stimulates challenge appraisal, promoting proactive work behavior, and induces workplace anxiety, leading to work withdrawal behavior. Additionally, learning goal orientation moderates these effects. Specifically, it strengthens the positive relationship between performance pressure and challenge appraisal while weakening the link between performance pressure and workplace anxiety. Discussion: This study highlights the complex and dual nature of performance pressure in influencing employee behavior. By identifying learning goal orientation as a critical moderator, organizations can better understand how to harness the positive aspects of performance pressure while mitigating its negative effects. These insights provide practical guidance for managing performance pressure and minimizing associated risks in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.