ArticleHeliyon2025
Perceptions of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine: Insights from a large-scale international cross-sectional survey of surgery researchers and clinicians.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Pain Researcher and Clinician Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the potential benefits of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) in perioperative care and the high prevalence of their use alongside conventional treatments, understanding perceptions of CAIM during surgery is important. Methods: A survey was conducted among authors who published in surgery journals. 40 074 clinicians and researchers were invited to participate. The survey included questions about demographics and CAIM perceptions. Results: The survey received 599 responses, with most identifying as both researchers and clinicians (n = 331, 55.3 %). Mind-body therapies (n = 212, 47.1 %) were considered the most promising CAIM areas for surgery. Most respondents believed CAIM therapies are safe (n = 184, 46.2 %) but were uncertain about their effectiveness (n = 153, 38.6 % disagreed and n = 169, 42.7 % were neutral). Many agreed on the value of CAIM research (n = 310, 77.9 %), increased funding (n = 224, 55.9 %), and clinician training through formal (n = 215, 52.9 %) and supplementary (n = 246, 61.8 %) education. Conclusions: Surgery clinicians and researchers show strong interest in more CAIM education and research. This study's findings can guide the development of resources and training programs to improve CAIM knowledge and perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.