ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Development and validation of a novel AI-derived index for predicting COPD medical costs in clinical practice.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Real-World Evaluation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting COPD-Related Healthcare Costs.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Exploratory Analysis of Electrical Impedance Tomography Features Associated with Spirometric Airflow Limitation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major contributor to global morbidity and healthcare costs. Accurately predicting these costs is crucial for resource allocation and patient care. This study developed and validated an AI-driven COPD Medical Cost Prediction Index (MCPI) to forecast healthcare expenses in COPD patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 396 COPD patients was conducted, utilizing clinical, demographic, and comorbidity data. Missing data were addressed through advanced imputation techniques to minimize bias. The final predictors included interactions such as Age × BMI, alongside Tumor Presence, Number of Comorbidities, Acute Exacerbation frequency, and the DOSE Index. A Gradient Boosting model was constructed, optimized with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation on an 80/20 train-test split. Model performance was assessed with Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-squared (R²). Results: On the training set, the model achieved an MSE of 0.049, MAE of 0.159, MAPE of 3.41 %, and R² of 0.703. On the test set, performance metrics included an MSE of 0.122, MAE of 0.258, MAPE of 5.49 %, and R² of 0.365. Tumor Presence, Age, and BMI were identified as key predictors of cost variability. Conclusions: The MCPI demonstrates strong potential for predicting healthcare costs in COPD patients and enables targeted interventions for high-risk individuals. Future research should focus on validation with multicenter datasets and the inclusion of additional socioeconomic variables to enhance model generalizability and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.