ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Teaching Internal Medicine Residents to Critically Appraise the Role of Race in Pulmonary Function Testing.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Race-specific equations for spirometry reference values are one example of race-specific algorithms traditionally used in medicine. The American Thoracic Society now recommends use of race-neutral reference equations instead of race-specific equations. However, no published curricula on interpretation of spirometry using race-based compared to race-neutral reference equations exist. We developed a curriculum for internal medicine residents to address this gap and equip providers to interpret spirometry in a race-conscious fashion. Methods: An internal medicine resident and an attending in pulmonary medicine developed the curriculum and invited other experts to review and edit the material. The internal medicine resident delivered an hour-long, interactive, slide-based, didactic presentation during a weekly, residency-wide videoconference to 45 participants. The presentation included the following components: (1) history of spirometry and race, (2) race-specific equations, (3) race-neutral equations, and (4) clinical implications. The presentation opened with a clinical case and small-group discussions. We conducted pre- and posttest surveys; the posttest survey was designed using the Kirkpatrick model to assess reaction, learning, and anticipated behavioral change. Mean score differences were evaluated for level 2 questions using Cohen's Results: Thirty-eight respondents completed the pretest survey, and 24 completed the posttest survey. Test scores significantly improved after session participation, with Cohen's Discussion: This curriculum was successful in engaging participants in critically appraising race-based interpretations of pulmonary function testing. The structure of the curriculum could be repurposed to create didactic content on other examples of race-based clinical algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.