ArticleNew microbes and new infections2025
Adherence to stand-by emergency treatment and mosquito protection measures in short-term travellers to moderate malaria risk areas.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Malaria Prevention: Progress to Date.Drugs · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malaria remains a threat to travellers to (sub)tropical regions. This study assessed adherence to malaria prevention measures among travellers to moderate-risk malaria areas, including the use of standby emergency treatment (SBET), healthcare-seeking behaviour during fever, and mosquito protection measures. Methods: We analysed data from adult travellers to moderate-risk malaria areas participating in a prospective study (2018-2023) at the Public Health Service of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Participants maintained a daily diary during travel, recording questions about adherence to mosquito protection measures, symptoms, SBET use, and seeking medical help. In case of fever, participants were instructed to measure their temperature, use SBET if in a remote area, and seek medical help. We used Poisson regression to assess determinants for adherence to mosquito protection measures. Results: Of 686 recruited travellers, 405 (59 %) completed the diary. Of these travellers 44 % received a pre-travel SBET prescription, although presumably only a small fraction of them actually travelled remotely. None of the 25 travellers who reported fever used the prescribed SBET and five sought medical care. Thirty-five percent of participants used DEET and 5 % used a mosquito net on ≥75 % of the nights with malaria risk. Longer travel duration was associated with lower adherence to DEET use. Conclusions: Few travellers with fever used SBET or sought medical care, despite their pre-travel advice. To reduce costs and medication spillage, SBET should only be advised to travellers who travel to very remote regions where medical help is inaccessible. Further research should focus on the behavioural concepts underlying these choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.