ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Targeted generative data augmentation for automatic metastases detection from free-text radiology reports.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Synthetic Data Generation by Language Models in Biomedical Research and Application: Data Utility and Quality Perspectives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic identification of metastatic sites in cancer patients from electronic health records is a challenging yet crucial task with significant implications for diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we demonstrate how advancements in natural language processing, namely the instruction-following capability of recent large language models and extensive model pretraining, made it possible to automate metastases detection from radiology reports texts with a limited amount of gold-labeled data. Specifically, we prompt Llama3, an open-source instruction-tuned large language model, to generate synthetic training data to expand our limited labeled data and adapt BERT, a small pretrained language model, to the task. We further investigate three targeted data augmentation techniques which selectively expand the original training samples, leading to comparable or superior performance compared to vanilla data augmentation, in most cases, while being substantially more computationally efficient. In our experiments, data augmentation improved the average F1-score by 2.3, 3.5, and 3.9 points for lung, liver, and adrenal glands, the organs for which we had access to expert-annotated data. This observation suggests that Llama3, which has not been specifically tailored to this task or clinical data in general, can generate high-quality synthetic data through paraphrasing in the clinical context. We also compare metastasis identification accuracy between models utilizing institutionally standardized reports vs. non-structured reports, which complicate the extraction of relevant information, and show how including patient history with a customized model architecture narrows the gap between those two setups from 7.3 to 4.5 points on F1-score under LoRA tuning. Our work delivers a broadly applicable solution with remarkable performance that does not require model customization for each institution, making large-scale, low-cost spatio-temporal cancer progression pattern extraction possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.