ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
Rare Encounter: A Case Report of Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor - An Uncommon Mesenchymal Tumor in the Liver.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Misdiagnosis of a giant hepatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: A case report].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Treatment of Primary Hepatic Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor (PEComa) in Adults: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare neoplastic mesenchymal tumor, more frequently found in the uterus, although it can occur in different organs. Hepatic PEComa is extremely rare, with only a few cases described in the literature. Case Presentation: We present a case report of a 33-year-old female patient with a history of macroprolactinoma. She was initially referred to our Department due to a 9-mm hepatic nodule incidentally diagnosed in an abdominal ultrasound in 2018. She was asymptomatic. Follow-up ultrasound showed a growth from 9 mm to 16 mm in 2019 and 30 mm in a liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in 2022. The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting, and since malignant transformation or hepatocellular carcinoma could not be ruled out, the decision was to undergo hepatic resection. An open hepatic subsegmentectomy of segment 5 was performed, with uneventful postoperative period. The definitive diagnosis was hepatic PEComa. Conclusion: Hepatic PEComas are rare liver tumors, and their preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to the lack of specific radiological features. In most cases, the diagnosis is only confirmed through histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. Resection of the lesion appears to be the curative treatment; however, due to the rarity of the condition, there are no studies comparing surgical treatment with other options. In our case, the hypervascular lesion was initially misdiagnosed as an adenoma. PEComas should be considered as a differential diagnosis in liver nodules with well-defined margins and increased uptake in the arterial phase in computed tomography or MRI scan. Surgical resection was curative, and no recurrence was detected during the patient's follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.