Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981160›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2025

Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma recurrence: A case report and literature review.

Riya Sood, Trisha Badjatia, Peeyush Bhargava

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riya SoodDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Trisha BadjatiaDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Peeyush BhargavaDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma (MRA) is a relatively uncommon type of rectal cancer, accounting for only about 5%-10% of all adenocarcinomas of the rectum. Characterized by the presence of extracellular mucin constituting at least 50% of the tumor volume, MRA is associated with a poorer prognosis and more advanced tumor stage at presentation compared to nonmucinous rectal adenocarcinomas. We report a case of a 42-year-old male patient with no family history of colorectal cancer, who presented with chronic diarrhea and was diagnosed with T3N0 MRA. We highlight the multimodality imaging features of recurrent and metastatic disease specific to this subtype of rectal carcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaImagingMucinousRectal

Identifiers

PMID39981160
PMCPMC11840533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.