ReviewAcademic pathology
#PathArt: from glass slide to canvas; with a mission of enlightening the burdens of life.
Review in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathology requires visual aptitude, pattern, and color recognition as a medical specialty. This can account for the growing PathArt (or #PathArt via social media, or SoMe) movement. For the purpose of this review, the authors define PathArt as any form of art inspired by pathology topics, such as microscopic images (i.e. surgical histology, cytology, hematology, immunohistochemistry), gross pathology, and clinical pathology (including molecular/genetics). Pathologists are well-versed in the use of hashtags and commonly utilize them to tag relevant medical topics to share with colleagues through online platforms, such as Twitter (renamed X in 2023). As the professional laboratory network has expanded virtually, artists within the community have emerged and shared numerous pathology artworks. However, displaying pathology as "beautiful" art pieces gives rise to concerns over portraying cancer light-heartedly given the humanity of disease. For this review, we discuss the history of art and medicine, pathology as a visual and creative specialty, explore the conceptual framework of the hashtag #PathArt is associated with sharing pathology-related art on SoMe, and address the psychological and medico-legal implications that surround PathArt. This article is intended to provide a guide to fostering PathArt and #PathArt in an ethical and positive manner. References were obtained via qualitative review of non-peer-reviewed and peer-reviewed literature pertinent to this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.