ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025
Case Report: Accuracy analysis of a new scanning body for intraoral digital impressions in full-arch edentulous patients.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Assistance and breakthrough of digitalization and intelligent digitalization in implant restoration of edentulous jaws].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This clinical report aimed to compare the scanning accuracy of SRA, and a novel extended scan body in edentulous patients. Through quantitative analysis, the study provided data support for oral prosthodontics and digital treatments. Edentulous patients with six Straumann bone-level implants were selected. The scan data was compared to the standard model derived from traditional impressions to evaluate scanning accuracy. The SRA scan bodies showed lower accuracy (46 ± 45 μm), while the Segma scan bodies with an extended structure achieved significantly higher accuracy (20 ± 2 μm). The extended structure effectively reduced image stitching errors in challenging intraoral regions, improving accuracy and speed. The Segma scan bodies with an extended structure accurately replicated spatial position information of implants in edentulous patients, providing insights for oral prosthodontics and digital treatments to enhance restoration quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.