Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39981104›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

A review of human factors and infusion pumps: lessons for procurement.

Laura Herrero, Marina Cano, Raj Ratwani, Laura Sánchez, Blanca Sánchez, Ramón Sancibrián, Galo Peralta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura HerreroInnovation Support Unit, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Marina CanoInnovation Support Unit, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Raj RatwaniMedStar Health National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Laura SánchezInnovation Support Unit, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Blanca SánchezClinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Ramón SancibriánDepartment of Structural and Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Galo PeraltaInnovation Support Unit, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating advanced technologies like medical devices in healthcare is crucial for addressing critical challenges, but patient safety must remain the top priority. In modern clinical settings, medical devices, such as infusion devices used to administer fluids and drugs, carry risks from use errors, requiring a focus on usability and human factors engineering (HFE). Despite the significance of integrating HFE into technology selection processes, it is often overlooked. A review of five key articles demonstrates how applying HFE principles in procurement strategies can enhance device usability and patient safety. Although designed to reduce medication errors, infusion devices can still cause over-infusion or delays, indicating the need for improved safety features that must be considered in the context of sociotechnical systems. The reviewed studies suggest incorporating HFE in design, purchasing, and implementation to address these issues. The studies highlight various HFE methodologies, showing a wide variation in design, deployment, interpretation, and reporting. This comprehensive examination underscores the importance of standardised evaluations to ensure safer and more effective medical devices, emphasizing the essential role of HFE in advancing patient safety within healthcare settings.

Indexed as

decision makingergonomicshospitalsinfusion pumpsorganizationalpatient safetypurchasing

Identifiers

PMID39981104
PMCPMC11841431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.