ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
A novel machine learning methodology for the systematic extraction of chronic kidney disease comorbidities from abstracts.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced early chronic kidney disease prediction using hybrid waterwheel plant algorithm for deep neural network optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a global health concern and is frequently underdiagnosed due to its subtle initial symptoms, contributing to increasing morbidity and mortality. A comprehensive understanding of CKD comorbidities could lead to the identification of risk-groups, more effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. Our research presents a two-fold objective: developing an effective machine learning (ML) workflow for text classification and entity relation extraction and assembling a broad list of diseases influencing CKD development and progression. Methods: We analysed 39,680 abstracts with CKD in the title from the Embase library. Abstracts about a disease affecting CKD development and/or progression were selected by multiple ML classifiers trained on a human-labelled sample. The best classifier was further trained with active learning. Disease names in question were extracted from the selected abstracts using a novel entity relation extraction methodology. The resulting disease list and their corresponding abstracts were manually checked and a final disease list was created. Findings: The SVM model gave the best results and was chosen for further training with active learning. This optimised ML workflow enabled us to discern 68 comorbidities across 15 ICD-10 disease groups contributing to CKD progression or development. The reading of the ML-selected abstracts showed that some diseases have direct causal effect on CKD, while others, like schizophrenia, has indirect causal effect on CKD. Interpretation: These findings have the potential to guide future CKD investigations, by facilitating the inclusion of a broader array of comorbidities in CKD prognostic models. Ultimately, our study enhances understanding of prognostic comorbidities and supports clinical practice by enabling improved patient monitoring, preventive strategies, and early detection for individuals at higher CKD development or progression risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.