ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Validation of a composite outcome measure for inpatient psychiatry using scales from the interRAI-MH.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with seclusion and restraint on admission to forensic psychiatric hospitals: A 10-year retrospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inpatient psychiatry is a critical service in a community-based care system for persons with serious mental illness (SMI). Currently, there are few generally accepted or widely used outcomes to assess the effectiveness of inpatient treatment. Method: Following a Donabedian Model of Health Care Quality, we utilized eight scales from the RAI Mental Health assessment to derive a clinician-scored outcome measure consisting of 4 domains (Psychosis, Depression, Impairment, and Aggression). We combined subscales measuring these domains into a Composite Measure. We used this measure to assess the entire population (N=719) of our large specialized mental health hospital at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of three months in the hospital (or admission to discharge in shorter stays). We evaluated the content validity of the measure by comparing items and scales with a list of putative contributors to hospital admission (symptoms and complications). To evaluate concurrent validity, we compared mean scores among hospital units with varying lengths of stay and clinical complexity (acute versus chronic versus complex chronic). We used ROC analysis to evaluate the CIIMHS's ability to predict discharge from the hospital. To evaluate construct validity, we examined the measure's responsiveness to changes among patients after treatment in the hospital. Results: We found strong evidence for all four kinds of validity. Conclusions: The composite measure represents a valid measure of inpatient mental health status and will serve as a valuable measure of the quality of care for inpatient psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.