ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2025
A Systematic Review of Research Tools, Research Status and Improvement Measures for Osteoporosis Awareness in Chinese and International.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of osteoporosis and hip fracture in older Chinese adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice about osteoporosis in women with osteoporosis in Iran.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- Health outcomes and care needs after osteoporotic fractures in rural Chinese older adults: policy implications.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoporosis, a prevalent degenerative bone disorder, and its associated complications can have a substantial impact on patients. To enhance osteoporosis prevention, it is imperative to explore the public's awareness of this condition. Methods: In this paper, literature related to osteoporosis awareness, which was published from October 2020 to October 2023, was searched in the CNKI, Wanfang, and PubMed databases. After the establishment of volume exclusion criteria, 16 articles were ultimately included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted the study methods, tools, and results. Results: Currently, most international research tools are questionnaires that have undergone rigorous reliability and validity testing and are extensively applied in clinical research. In contrast, in China, there is a paucity of research tools and cases, with most relying on translations of international questionnaires. The findings indicate that the awareness of osteoporosis among the general population in China and other countries is relatively low, and the awareness level in China is generally lower than that in developed countries. Currently, there are diverse measures to enhance awareness, including traditional media and online education via the Internet. All results suggest that active education can significantly boost awareness. Conclusion: The area of osteoporosis awareness research remains relatively under - explored, and research tools need to be tailored to the characteristics of populations in different regions. Currently, there are few relevant studies, and their results consistently show that the public's awareness of osteoporosis is relatively low. Existing evidence demonstrates that health education can improve awareness, so healthcare professionals should place greater emphasis on bone health education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.