Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980911›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025

A pilot mixed methods randomized control trial investigating the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally tailored intervention focused on beliefs, mistrust and race-congruent peer support for Black adults with diabetes.

Meng-Jung Wen, Martha Maurer, Annika L Pickard, Makenzie Hansen, Olayinka O Shiyanbola

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng-Jung WenDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences in Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Martha MaurerSonderegger Research Center for Improved Medication Outcomes, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Annika L PickardDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences in Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Makenzie HansenDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences in Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Olayinka O ShiyanbolaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

Expanding the CAARN to accelerate research on multiple chronic conditions with rural and African-American communities and health-care providersR33AG061699 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorothy Farrar Edwards, Hongrui Jiang · 2019 to 2026
$5.1M
NIA NIH HHS R33 AG061699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Black adults disproportionately experience poor glycemic control and medication nonadherence, yet few diabetes self-management programs address their unique health beliefs, provider mistrust and sociocultural barriers to taking diabetes medications. This 6-month pilot randomized feasibility trial compared a culturally tailored diabetes self-management program, incorporating beliefs about diabetes, mistrust, and race-congruent peer support to a standard diabetes program. Methods: An embedded mixed methods design examined the feasibility of the pilot trial, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence and participant acceptability. Data were collected through participant self-reported questionnaires, field notes, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups. Qualitative content analysis inductively explored participants' feedback on the program, participation barriers and potential strategies to overcome the challenges. Mixed methods integration was implemented using a side-by-side joint display to compare, synthesize and interconnect the quantitative and qualitative results across all feasibility domains. Results: Thirteen participants (93%) completed the trial, demonstrating high adherence and retention. Community outreach and a prerequisite orientation using motivational interviewing were feasible and appropriate to recruit potential participants. Participants expressed high satisfaction and acceptability, highlighting the importance of peer support, cultural relevant content and a safe space for sharing experiences. Barriers to participation were identified including schedule conflicts and difficulties in engagement. Discussion: Future large-scale effectiveness trials should consider combining multimedia into recruitment methods, tailoring the program to address medication-taking goals, and addressing social and environmental barriers to support sustained lifestyle changes.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanDiabetes MellitusHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CarePeer GroupSelf-ManagementTrustAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBlack or African Americandiabetes mellitusfeasibility studieshealth inequitiesmixed methods researchpeer supportself-management

Identifiers

PMID39980911
PMCPMC11841499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.