ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Rural perinatal nursing in Canada: A hermeneutic literature review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orchestrating care for a good life event: a hermeneutic study of the overlooked practices of rural perinatal nurses.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurses working in rural and remote settings are central to the delivery of perinatal services, often as the initial providers to assess and manage patients. Although policies and guidelines dictate nurses' responsibilities, little research focuses on rural perinatal nursing practice. Articulation of nurses' actual and significant involvement in rural perinatal care is needed as increasingly sustaining rural perinatal services is in jeopardy. Objective: The study aimed to answer the question, "How are nurses understood to be involved in the delivery of rural perinatal care?" Design: A hermeneutic literature review. Setting: Rural and remote Canada. Methods: A hermeneutic literature review was conducted through a two-phase, interpretive process of evaluation and deliberation for relevance and meaning carried out through dialogue and questioning with the selected texts and among members of the research team. This process provided deepened understanding of rural perinatal nursing practice and the contexts in which it takes place, highlighting not only what was evident in the texts, but also what was missing regarding nurses' involvement in the provision of perinatal care. Results: Seven of 38 grey literature documents, and 25 research articles out of 800 were selected as relevant to the research question. Rural nurses' perinatal practice was found to be largely invisible in the literature. Only a few studies focused on nurses, demonstrating their autonomy and agency to benefit patients, other providers, and system functioning, despite many contextual and health system constraints. Rural nurses' experiences and insights were found rarely to be represented in perinatal policy and guidelines. Conclusions: Rural nurses voices and practices are rarely represented in the research and grey literature relevant to rural perinatal services. Nurses' insights and experiences are essential to ensure that policies and practices in healthcare organizations foster the sustainability of rural perinatal care for rural/remote childbearing families and the retention of nurses in rural practice. Tweetable abstract: Canadian rural perinatal nurses' practices are largely invisible in research and grey literature. Their voices and recognition of their contributions to care are needed to sustain rural maternity services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.