Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980814›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2025

Modern approaches to lymphatic surgery: a narrative review.

Emily A Zurbuchen, Nina Yu, Ara A Salibian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Factors associated with lymphedema therapist willingness to refer to surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily A ZurbuchenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Nina YuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ara A SalibianDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive disease secondary to damage to the lymphatic system that results in interstitial fluid accumulation, fat deposition and inflammation. Lymphatic surgery includes a spectrum of procedures aimed to treat these sequelae of lymphedema as well as decrease the risk of lymphedema if performed as prophylactic surgery. We reviewed the literature regarding current surgical treatment options for lymphedema, imaging approaches, and directions the field may head towards both in treatment access and techniques. Methods: We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify approaches to surgical management of lymphedema, including physiologic and reductive methods, as well as challenges that lymphedema patients face for adequate access and insurance coverage to surgical treatment options. Key Content and Findings: Lymphatic surgery can be broadly categorized as physiologic or reductive. Physiologic lymphatic surgery functions to decrease the fluid burden associated with lymphedema and includes lymphovenous bypass as well as vascularized lymph node transplant procedures. Reductive lymphatic surgery reduces the fibroadipose component of lymphedema and include suction lipectomy and excisional procedures. Advances in imaging technology as well as supermicrosurgical techniques have allowed for reproducible, positive clinical outcomes after lymphatic procedures. Access to care and coverage of procedures are persistent challenges in the field, though increasing adoption and research have led to important strides forward to providing patients with this care. Conclusions: Lymphatic surgery can improve symptoms and quality of life for lymphedema patients. A clear understanding of the predominant pathology in a patient (i.e., fluid dominant vs. fat dominant) can help guide counseling and surgical management options for patients. Despite the established benefits for patients, equitable access and insurance coverage for lymphedema surgery are still required.

Indexed as

lymphatic surgeryLymphedemalymphovenous bypass (LVB)supermicrosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39980814
PMCPMC11836749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.