ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
Repeat Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Remains a Challenge for Orthopedic Surgeons.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-cell sequencing reveals cellular heterogeneity and molecular mechanisms in tendon and enthesis injury repair.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The re-revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be contemplated a secure and efficacious surgical technique with good results, whether it is performed in one-stage or two-stages or is performed with autograft or allograft. With regard to the surgical technique, there is no evidence that performing ACLR in one stage is superior to performing it in two stages. With respect to graft choice, allograft is the most chosen, and the allograft most frequently utilized is the Achilles tendon. However, the best graft to use for re-revision is not yet known. For revision ACLR orthopedic surgeons have to contemplate the amendment of an outrageous posterior tibial slope, especially after having failed two or more consecutive interventions. The potential benefit of combining ACLR with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction is to achieve greater rotational stability. It will diminish both the elevated failure percentages observed specifically in young individuals and increasing osteoarthritic changes encountered following sole ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.