Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39980791›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Endocardial gaglionated plexi ablation in different vagally-mediated clinical settings: From cardioneuroablation to cardio-neuromodulation.

Marco Rebecchi, Ermenegildo De Ruvo, Antonella Sette, Domenico Grieco, Lucia De Luca, Stefano Strano, Marco Tomaino, Domenico Giamundo, Stefano Sasso, Chiara Carabotta and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marco RebecchiDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9604-6969
Ermenegildo De RuvoDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Antonella SetteDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Domenico GriecoDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-3023
Lucia De LucaDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Stefano StranoSyncope Unit, La 'Sapienza', University of Rome, Italy.
Marco TomainoDivision of Cardiology, Ospedale Generale Regionale, Bolzano, Italy.
Domenico GiamundoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Stefano SassoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CarabottaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Pietro DesimoneDepartment of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro FagagniniDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Cinzia CrescenziDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-608X
Annamaria MartinoDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Germana PanattoniDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1837-8565
Fabiana RomeoDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Marianna SguegliaDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BarillàDepartment of Systems Medicine, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Michele BrignoleIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-5607
Leonardo CalòDepartment of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-5286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is now recognized as a safe and effective method in patients with cardioinhibitory neurocardiogenic syncope (CNCS), especially in young patients in order to avoid or prolong, as much as possible, the timing of definitive cardiac pacing. Several investigations have shown beneficial and very satisfactory results with a standard non-extensive endocardial ablation, aimed at identifying high-amplitude fragmented signals in the right and left atria. Despite this, the current scientific debate is focused about a proposal on an ablative method, even more individualized than CNA (at least as a first approach), considering that a standardized approach, especially in the left atrium, could expose CNCS patients with a good prognosis to an excessive risk of complications. These findings, moving from the concept of CNA to a new concept of 'cardioneuromodulation', opened a new era, aimed at a non-extensive and individualized treatment of different clinical CNCS scenarios or vagally-mediated atrioventricular block or sinus-atrial node dysfunction.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemCardioinhibitory neurocardiogenic syncopeCardioneuroablationCardioneuromodulationGanglionated plexi ablation

Identifiers

PMID39980791
PMCPMC11836691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.