ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Can we slow down the decline in renal function?
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Cardiorenal syndrome: causes, diagnosis and treatment of congestive nephropathy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 'chronic kidney disease' (CKD) definition that best outlines the complex syndrome commonly called 'kidney failure' has become a problem of World Public Health due to its incidence and prevalence and due to exponentially increasing costs in every part of the world. The progressive reduction in the glomerular filtration rate, as known, goes hand in hand with an increase in cardiovascular risk understood as fatal and non-fatal heart attack, stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Therefore, every effort must aim at preventing or slowing down the decline in renal function in order to reduce not only critical renal events (the need for dialysis or transplantation among the most dreadful) but also the incidence of cardiovascular events. Since the disease is asymptomatic for a long time (often its detection is occasional and done with guilty delay), it is clearly important to make a correct and early evaluation of renal function with appropriate methods. Furthermore, it is crucial to make an aetiological diagnosis, when it is possible, of CKD because this will allow for the most targeted therapy possible. For a long time, an effective approach for the majority of people with CKD could only count on strict control of the diabetic disease and its complications, optimization of high blood pressure values, and the mandatory use of drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, particularly in the presence of albuminuria. Over time, this strategy proved to be only partially effective and the majority of patients nonetheless showed a progressive worsening of renal function. Only recently have we had access to two classes of innovative drugs such as glyphozines and incretins which have established themselves on the therapeutic scene because they have shown to be able to slow down the progression of CKD, first in patients with type 2 diabetes and subsequently in patients with CKD whether or not they have diabetes. Unexpectedly and convincingly, they have also been shown to significantly impact cardiovascular prognosis. From initially antidiabetic drugs, their effectiveness has forced the medical iconography to enrich itself with a new therapeutic niche by rightly speaking of 'cardio-nephro-metabolic' drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.